Yahoo奇摩知識+將於 2021 年 5 月 4 日 (美國東部時間) 終止服務。自 2021 年 4 月 20 日 (美國東部時間) 起,Yahoo奇摩知識+服務將會轉為唯讀模式。其他Yahoo奇摩產品與服務或您的Yahoo奇摩帳號都不會受影響。如需關於Yahoo奇摩知識+ 停止服務以及下載您個人資料的資訊,請參閱說明網頁。
5 個解答
- 匿名使用者2 年前最佳解答
Yes, 100% and has been shown to stand the test of time (though some may need help with the original wording). The ideals have spread to other areas beside warfare such as business, sports, and politics and is an excellent work literature...as long as you don't expect it to solve all of life's problems
- E. H. AmosLv 72 年前
Yes. Frankly I think the first paragraph at this link explains how very effective using "soft power" to win, VERSUS going to actual war still works. Look at the pressure Trump & other countries (united) are putting on IRAN vs, going into a direct conflict. (Their economy is crumbing.)
- skeptikLv 72 年前
Well, it's not a "theory" so much as it's an entire book full of them. But yes, it's still useful.
From what I've heard from a few graduates, it's recommended reading (or at least it was when they attended) at the Citadel, West Point, and the Air Force Academy. Probably others as well.
- 2 年前
When the political scientist Ivan Arreguín-Toft did the calculation a few years ago, what he came up with was 71.5 percent. Just under a third of the time, the weaker country wins. Arreguín-Toft then asked the question slightly differently. What happens in wars between the strong and the weak when the weak side does as David did and refuses to fight the way the bigger side wants to fight, using unconventional or guerrilla tactics? The answer: in those cases, the weaker party’s winning percentage climbs from 28.5 percent to 63.6 percent.